Other Musical Equipment > General Discussion

Taking the plunge

(1/2) > >>

ducatidoc:
The wireless plunge, that is. After almost 46 years since taking up the bass, I'm ready to ditch the cord. Fools may rush in, but the smart money says check with fellow Sunnistas.    What's anybody using for bass ?  In my case, I  want to connect a 4-string passive 'Wick Star Bass to a '69 2000S. No effects in the chain (yet).

EdBass:
I spent some time with Nady systems in the 90's, they worked OK and I know that the technology has advanced exponentially in the past couple decades. That said, as far as signal quality the best $2K wireless in the world is inferior to $25 worth of copper.
Wireless is freeing, cable is rock solid.
I was thinking about that as I was watching Jeff Beck dragging his white cable around the stage a few weeks ago. I'm thinking it was white to help his 74 yr old eyes minimize the tripping hazard...  :wink:

ducatidoc:
I've heard that as well, but I'm not sure my tone is refined enough to notice the difference unless I was recording. I've often wondered the same thing about having multiple effects pedals and signal routers in the chain: surely that's got to have a big degradation effect ?

loudthud:
I always wanted to use a wireless to find out what I sounded like in the back of the room. Can't trust the sound guy when he says, "Oh, you sound fine".

EdBass:

--- Quote from: loudthud on September 13, 2018, 05:31:12 pm ---I always wanted to use a wireless to find out what I sounded like in the back of the room. Can't trust the sound guy when he says, "Oh, you sound fine".

--- End quote ---

Especially the sound guy that you already had to argue with about using a mic'ed cab rather than a DI off of the bass itself.  :-D

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page