Author Topic: Is This Legal?  (Read 4333 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline stanner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
    • s t a n o s a u r
Is This Legal?
« on: December 25, 2008, 02:55:35 am »
AMPSSOUNDBETTERLOUDER

Offline biltmore

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 248
  • The Sound Choice
Re: Is This Legal?
« Reply #1 on: December 25, 2008, 03:15:08 am »
Good quesiton. Haha. I've seen that website/company before, someone linked to it in another forum I frequent. I guess they're all about custom made amps, and it seems to me that there's probably more than one ripoff or two.

Offline stanner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
    • s t a n o s a u r
Re: Is This Legal?
« Reply #2 on: December 25, 2008, 10:15:20 pm »
yeah it seems the only thing missing is a SUNN logo.
AMPSSOUNDBETTERLOUDER

Offline Johnny Guitar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 105
Re: Is This Legal?
« Reply #3 on: December 25, 2008, 10:34:46 pm »
Hello Stanner       I can't see anything on your post  :?  What website are you talking about?   Help TBOY!! 

Johnny Guitar

Offline stanner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
    • s t a n o s a u r
Re: Is This Legal?
« Reply #4 on: December 26, 2008, 02:09:23 pm »
its showing up for everyone-why not you?
here it is again:
https://taweber.powweb.com/store/6s100_ad.htm
AMPSSOUNDBETTERLOUDER

Offline loudthud

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,171
Re: Is This Legal?
« Reply #5 on: December 26, 2008, 02:40:23 pm »
Worked for me. Might be an issue being a secure site. Check your browser's security settings. The amp uses a Marshall transformer set that doesn't have the ultralinear taps. Also the amp doesn't have the Pi filtered B+. It's more of a conventional design. There is also a 200W amp he's working on that's still in the prototype stage.

Offline Ryan Phelps

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
Re: Is This Legal?
« Reply #6 on: December 26, 2008, 03:34:41 pm »
Sunn Fans,
I posted this amp earlier under the D.I.Y. forum for those interested in building something similar to a Sunn 60 watt head. As Loudthud points out, the transformers are not the same as Sunn, nor are the phase inverter or the tone recovery tube. So the only real similarity is the use of a pair of KT88's (or 6550) output tubes and a vague cosmetic resemblance to a Sunn Model T.
I doubt that there are any grounds for copyright / trademark / patent infringement here. Frankly, I'm surprised that Sunn didn't get into legal trouble with Dynaco back in the 60's. Sunn's designs were much more closely based on Dynaco's circuitry than Weber's design is related to Sunn's.
I've built one of Weber's 6M18 kits......basically a variation on the Marshall 18 watt platform. There are a ton kits and boutique amps out there based on Marshall, as well as Fender designs. Remember that Jim Marshall based the first JTM-45 on Fender's Bassman (5F6A), and Leo Fender based the 5F6A on a Western Electric circuit! There is very little completely original tube circuit design out there. Most amp designers have studied the classic circuits and come up with variations, modifications or new combinations. This makes for a lot of "flavors" of amps out there. And just like with cooking......you can stir up your own receipe at home if you are so inclined!
Ted Weber makes very nice, well-priced kits, geared for experienced hobbyists and amp techs, that you can build to his stock schematic or hot-rod to suit yourself. I just thought some of you guys might be interested!

Ryan

Offline cromag

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 174
Re: Is This Legal?
« Reply #7 on: December 27, 2008, 02:06:26 pm »
besides the name of the amp and type, i'm not sure anything else could be copyrighted.  that wouldn't be very benificial to one manufacturer of components over another manufacturer.  if you really do some searching you can find "clones" for just about any sought after amp and pedal thats out there today.  and even some vintage ones no longer made. 

Offline stanner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
    • s t a n o s a u r
Re: Is This Legal?
« Reply #8 on: December 29, 2008, 04:58:32 pm »
this is my hippy dippy mind workin:
old amps have a certain mojo that i respect and look for and  play.
do they sound different than modern amps built to the same specs?
well i know the old Model Ts sound a world different from the Fender versions-
i have a Marshall SuperBass from '71 that sounds totally different from the modern day superbass.
so when i said 'is it legal' i was talkin Karma-wise.
merry new year yall
staninsanfran

AMPSSOUNDBETTERLOUDER

Offline Isaac

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,904
Re: Is This Legal?
« Reply #9 on: January 03, 2009, 11:49:34 am »
The Fender version of the Model T has very different circuitry than the old Model Ts had. Hack, the second generation Ts had a very different preamp section from the first generation. So it's no surprise that they sound different.
Isaac

Offline basiklybass

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 304
  • My Sunn's
    • The Old Days
Re: Is This Legal?
« Reply #10 on: January 14, 2009, 05:22:12 am »
Unless someone can verify that the circuit is taken from a Sunn and unless the person who owns the rights to the design sues...yep, it is legal.

You only need to change a few thiongs to make it a "New" amp.

Offline Soundmasterg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 745
Re: Is This Legal?
« Reply #11 on: January 14, 2009, 04:51:19 pm »
It wouldn't matter if the circuit was taken from one of the classic Sunn tube designs because those were almost identical to Dynaco products already, plus its been so long those circuits are now in public domain.

Greg