EdBass,
I think it's an optical illusion,due to the offset speakers. Both those cabs look the same 24" wide size to me.
Looks like a model 200S style cab on the left. A later 215-S style on the right.
I agree it's a deceptive angle but I'm pretty sure that's a 2000S cab on the left, not a 200S. I think maybe the 215S is closer to the camera than it appears to be. It just plain
looks big, like a 2000S without a grill to me, and I've seen a couple.
And, since I absolutely
hate to be wrong
, I used a ruler on my monitor, and sure enough the cab on the left appears to be almost exactly twice the width of the 15" driver, while the drivers in the one on the right are approx. 62% of the width of the cab..
Only one way to tell; Rich, I notice that the pic is dated 4 mos. ago, but if you still have it, how wide
is the cab on the left, 30" or 24"?
Also, 2000S amps didn't have 2 ohm taps from the factory. You can wire them for 16 & 8 or 8 & 4.
Here's an interesting fact, though; One of my 2000S rigs (head and two
4 ohm cabinets) was bought from a musician that toured it for several years. The
whole time he ran it at 2 ohms on the 4 ohm tap, and it's still as strong as a horse, original OT. The only replaced parts over the years were filter caps, tubes, and misc. coupling caps and resistors.
I won't run it like that, and I'm not saying you should either; but... the original owner of
that particular rig
did, and it's none the worse for wear.
I know tube amp gurus who say that a impedance mismatch really isn't a big deal, and Leo Fender's amps used to default to a dead short as a
protection device on his amps; that's a +/-
0 impedance load on a 4 or 8 ohm tap.
I'll stick with matched impedance for my gear, though. Maybe a mismatch won't destroy a tube amp as I was raised to believe, but it it will no doubt perform better at the proper load.