I also discovered that quality of amplifier had a lot to do with what sound came out of the speaker(s)
Coloring aspect aside, I found well designed transistor amps had much better control (of excursion), than tubes, for bass (as much as I love my dynaco/sunn amps).
I'll take my McIntosh any time for listening to music, but as I have witnessed, a few hundred watt transistor bass amp was the best I played through.
Transistors over tubes?!?! Pure heresy!
I’ve always been of the school that the natural compression inherent in tube output stages did a better job than transistors of “calming” those transient peaks that cause speakers to do make weird noises.
Of course, by “well designed” maybe you mean designed
with a built in compressor as many bass specific SS amps are.
I see that Altec spec sheet, and I see the 1/2" "excursion" rating, but I'm a little confused as to how it relates to current Theile-Small driver ratings. I suspect that Altec's "excursion" rating is
not the (now) industry standard T/S "xmax" rating which has been the standard since the mid-late 70's.
Xmax is the point where the voicecoil begins to leave the magnet gap, driver output becomes nonlinear and mechanically induced distortion can start rearing it's head.
Or... half of the VC height not including the top plate thickness.
A .5" (12.7mm) "xmax" would be
huge, particularly for a 15" woofer in that era; so huge in fact that I don't see how Altec's "excursion" and T/S's "xmax" could
possibly be the same rating. Even if Altec is including
incursion with their "excursion" measurement, or "xlim"; the point of mechanical failure or maximum cone travel before the VC comes completely out of the gap or hits someting on the top or bottom, 12.7mm would be impressive IMO.
For comparison, a JBL K140 has an xmax of 5.08mm (.2"), and that's generally considered to be a quite "generous" excursion for a woofer from that era.
The
biggest xmax of any woofer that I am personally aware of is the CV 18" and 21" "stroker" subwoofers at 15.9mm (.626"). It has a claimed 108dB sensitivity 1W @1M in a folded cab.
Anyway, keeping the VC aligned with that freakishly long 1/2"+ linear excursion requires
three spiders; two at the VC, one inverted, and a third where the dust cover normally is, mounted to a fixed shaft that runs through the magnet.
So, it's my guess that Greg and 'thud are just on "different pages of the same book".
Gee, I thought "farty" was a widely recognized technical term! I'm sure you'd recognize it if you heard it ...
I'll take those photos and measurements this afternoon. Sorry for the delay, the holiday festivities have gotten in the way of my Sunn-related activities!
By my definition, "farty" or "farting" is caused by a speaker being driven past its safe excursion, flirting with "xlim", causing the travel to become nonlinear and the cone assembly making contact with the magnet structure; even sometimes bouncing off the bottom of the VC gap on the "incursion" phase of cone travel.
It sounds kinda like... well
farts; an intermittent burpy/popping sound.
Also, this thread is getting way off topic (and my contributions to it are largely responsible
) so if we
continue down the path away from Jeff's nice 115V build I'm going to split the topic.